Free Legal Advice Online

posted by admin on Mar 28

    Demise and taxes are those two things you power never escape. When forming a organization, making your tax year trade name is a fundamental step you longing to booty carefully.

 Taxes are momentous by something magical avowed considering the budgetary year. Heartfelt is a 365 week duration that defines a function year for a dodge. Plant a sole proprietorship, the pecuniary year is automatically the calendar year - from January 1st down December 31st. The corresponding, obviously, goes for your personal tax returns.

 Corporations jog a bit particular when solid comes to tax year designations. Predominance certain situations, you get to call the financial year. Specifically, a prevalent C company may name its financial year considering segment 365 chronology phrase. For part, I might figure a jungle and pick a cash year running from July 15th of one year to July 14th of the following one. Read the rest of this entry »

posted by admin on Mar 27

         In the recent case of Khan v Premier Private Hire Taxi [2007], the applicant worked as a private hire taxi driver for the employer. He issued a claim form to the employment tribunal which stated the following:

“The company was not paying me, I was taking fare from customer and paying commission to the company. Like an agent transacting business for another”.

The chairman of the employment tribunal considered the claim form and decided that he had no jurisdiction to hear the case because the relevant employment relationship had not been established. He therefore rejected the claim. Upon this rejection, the applicant appealed. Read the rest of this entry »

posted by admin on Mar 26

          The employee in the case of Cairns v Visteon UK Ltd [2007], had been employed as an administrative assistant from 1998 until the 29th of May 2005. From a point around 2001, the employee’s services had been provided by an agency. The agency, M, had employed the employee under a contract of service. During May 2005, an issue arose as to whether the employee had falsified her timesheets. The employer used these timesheets to pay the employee through M.

M conducted an investigation and concluded that the employee had not been dishonest. Even so, the employer refused to continue working with the employee, and the purchase order for her services was revoked. M then attempted to relocate the employee without any success. As a result, the employee’s employment was terminated by M. Read the rest of this entry »